Categories
Catch All

The road to hell is paved with good intentions.

This talk by Alan Watts is one of my favorites. Here’s a transcript for those who prefer to read.

Start:

We aren’t better because we want to be. Because the road to hell is paved with good intentions. Because all the do gooders in the world whether they’re doing good for others or doing it for themselves are troublemakers. On the basis of ‘kindly let me help you or you’ll drown’, said the Monkey putting the fish safely up a tree. We white anglo saxon protestants; British, German, American. We have been on a rampage for the past hundred or more years to improve the world. We have given the benefits of our culture, our religion, our technology to everybody except perhaps the Australian aborigines. And we have insisted that they receive the benefits of our culture even our political styles our democracy you better be dead Democratic I will shoot you. And having conferred these blessings all over the place we wonder why everybody hates us. Because sometimes doing good to others and even doing go to oneself is amazingly destructive. Because it’s full of conceit. How do you know what’s good for other people? How do you know what’s good for you? If you say you want to improve. Then you want to know what’s good for you. But obviously you don’t because if you did you would be improved. So we don’t know. It’s like the problem of geneticists, which they face today. I went to a meeting of geneticists not so long ago where they gathered in a group of philosophers and theologians and said Now look here we need help. We now are on the verge of figuring out how to bring in any kind of human character. We would want to have. We give you saints, philosophers, scientists, great politicians, anything you want, just tell us what kind of human beings ought we to breed. 

So I said,  ‘How will those of us who are genetically unregenerated make up our minds what genetically generated people might be.?’ Because I’m afraid very much that our selection of virtues may not work. It may be like for example this new kind of high-yield grain which is made and which is becoming ecologically destructive. When we interfere with the processes of nature and breed efficient plants and efficient animals there’s always some way in which we have to pay for it. And I can well see that a eugenically-produced human beings might be dreadful. We could have a plague of virtuous people. Do you realize that? Any animal considered in itself is virtuous it does its thing but in crowds they’re awful. Like a cross crowd of ants, or locusts on the rampage, they’re all perfectly good animals. But it’s just too much I could imagine a perfectly pestiferous mass of a million signs. So I said to these people, ‘Look, if there’s anything you can do, just be sure that a vast variety of human beings is maintained.’ Don’t please bring us down to a few excellent types excellent for what we never know how circumstances are going to change. And how. Our need. For different kinds of people changes. 

At one time we may need very individualistic and aggressive people, at another time we may need very co-operative team working people. At another time we may need people who are full of interest in dexterous manipulation of the external world, at another time we may need people who explore into their own psychology and are introspective. There is no knowing but the mall varieties and the mosque ills we have obviously the better. So you see here again the problem comes out in genetics we do not really know how to interfere with the way the world is. The way the world actually is is an enormously complex interrelated organism. The same problem arises in medicine, because the body is a very complexly interrelated organism. And if you look at the body in a superficial way you may see there’s something wrong with it, here’s chicken pox. And the spots that it should come all out all over the place well you might say well spots of that cut them off. So you kill the bug. But then you find you’ve got real problems. Because you have to introduce some bugs to kill the bug, it’s like bringing rabbits into Australia. And that starts going all over the place and getting out of hand. And then you think well now wait a minute, it wasn’t the bugs in the blood there are bugs all over the place. What was wrong with this person that his blood system suddenly became vulnerable to those particular bugs his resistance was in doubt? Therefore what you should have given was not an antibiotic but vitamins. OK so we’re going to build up his resistance but resistance to what. You may build up resistance to this and this and this class of bugs, but then there’s another one that loves that situation it comes right in. See we always look at the human being medically, in bits and pieces, because we have heart specialists, lung specialists, bones specialists, nerve specialists, and so on. And they each see the human being from their point of view there are a few generalists but they realise that human bodies. Complicated that no one mind can understand it. And furthermore, supposing we do succeed in healing all these people of that diseases. What do we then do about the population problem. I mean we’ve stopped cholera, the black bubonic plague, we’re getting the better of tuberculosis, we may fix cancer and heart disease. 

Then what will people die of? Well they’ll just go on living. On the enormous quantities of others. Then we have to fix this birthing. Pills for everybody. Then we find one of the effects the side effects of those pills. What are the psychological effects upon men and women of not breeding of children in the usual way? We don’t know. And what seems a good thing today or yesterday like D.D.T. turns out tomorrow to been a disaster. What seemed in the moral and spiritual sphere, to like great virtues in times past are easily seen today as hideous evils, let’s take for example the Inquisition, in its own day among Catholics the Holy Inquisition was regarded. As we’d today regard the practice of psychiatry. You, you see, you feel that in curing the person of cancer almost anything is justified. The most complex operations, the most weird surgery people suspended for days and days on end on the end of tubes with X. ray penetration burning. Or people undergoing shock treatment, people locked in the colorless monotonous corridors of mental institution. In all good faith, they knew that witchcraft and heresy were terrible things. Often plagues imperiling people souls forever and ever. So any means we’re justified. To cure people of heresy. We don’t change. We’re doing the same thing today. But under different names. We can look back at those people and see how evil that was but we can’t see it in ourselves. So therefore, beware of virtue. 

Categories
Catch All

Crackpot sounding conspiracies that ended up being true.

This was slapped together, so the formatting is effed.

In the mid-70s the Church & Pike Committees (Senate and Congress respectively) uncovered activities that sound like crackpot conspiracies [1] but these ended up being true. I’ve also included a few outlandish non-amplified crackpot sounding situations too.

Did you know that Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) had a Chinese spy on her staff for about 20 years?

More than 400 Journalists in the CIA

This information is from the past, so it doesn’t imply it’s currently true. Then again, who the fuck knows. Carl Bernstein (one of the journalists who took down the Nixon presidency) wrote [2]:

“In 1953, Joseph Alsop, then one of America’s leading syndicated columnists, went to the Philippines to cover an election. He did not go because he was asked to do so by his syndicate. He did not go because he was asked to do so by the newspapers that printed his column. He went at the request of the CIA.

Alsop is one of more than 400 American journalists who in the past twenty‑five years have secretly carried out assignments for the Central Intelligence Agency, according to documents on file at CIA headquarters. Some of these journalists’ relationships with the Agency were tacit; some were explicit. There was cooperation, accommodation and overlap. Journalists provided a full range of clandestine services—from simple intelligence gathering to serving as go‑betweens with spies in Communist countries. Reporters shared their notebooks with the CIA. Editors shared their staffs. Some of the journalists were Pulitzer Prize winners, distinguished reporters who considered themselves ambassadors without‑portfolio for their country. Most were less exalted: foreign correspondents who found that their association with the Agency helped their work; stringers and freelancers who were as interested in the derring‑do of the spy business as in filing articles; and, the smallest category, full‑time CIA employees masquerading as journalists abroad. In many instances, CIA documents show, journalists were engaged to perform tasks for the CIA with the consent of the managements of America’s leading news organizations.”

The Church Committee report stated:

“The CIA currently maintains a network of several hundred foreign individuals around the world who provide intelligence for the CIA and at times attempt to influence opinion through the use of covert propaganda. These individuals provide the CIA with direct access to a large number of newspapers and periodicals, scores of press services and news agencies, radio and television stations, commercial book publishers, and other foreign media outlets.” [3]

Comment: Is there anyone with omniscience who can suss out whether or not this happening now? Didn’t one of the Dulles brothers say that CIA stood for Corporate Interests of America?

Gulf of Tonkin Ruse

Gulf of Tonkin, the ruse to gain public support for US escalation of Vietnam, didn’t happen. To quote Mother Jones, “50 Years Ago Today: Congress Authorizes Vietnam War Under Bullshit Pretense” [4].

“[O]nce-classified documents and tapes released in the past several years, combined with previously uncovered facts, make clear that high government officials distorted facts and deceived the American public about events that led to full U.S. involvement in the Vietnam War.”[5 ]

LSD Experiments on unwitting Americans and Canadians

For nearly ten years, 1953 to 1964, the CIA secretly dosed American and Canadian citizens with LSD. Through front companies, the CIA worked with over 80 institutions—hospitals, prisons, and universities—where they experimented on human beings with drugs and hypnosis combined with verbal and physical abuse. [6,7]

Fairly recent examples of either conspiracies and/or non-amplified news.

  • WMDs not in Iraq [8].
  • Sugar industry paying Harvard scientists to shift blame of heart disease to fat (but statins make billions, so nothing to see here.) [9].
  • Football leading to brain damage [10]. Finally admitted to by the NFL.
  • Hugo Chavez’s Assassination (Greg Palast). But there’s oil, five times the reserves of Saudi Arabia, so nothing to see here. [11]
  • Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) had a Chinese spy on her staff who worked for her for about 20 years [12 • Washington Post]

Footnotes:
1 – http://www.aarclibrary.org/publib/church/reports/contents.htm

2 – http://carlbernstein.com/magazine_cia_and_media.php

3 – https://archive.org/stream/finalreportofsel01unit/finalreportofsel01unit_djvu.txt

4 – https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2014/08/congress-authorizes-vietnam-war-gulf-of-tonkin/

5 – https://www.usni.org/magazines/naval-history-magazine/2008/february/truth-about-tonkin
6 –
https://www.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/national/13inmate_ProjectMKULTRA.pdf

7 – http://www.aarclibrary.org/publib/church/reports/book1/html/ChurchB1_0197b.htm

8 – No WMDs (duh)

9 – https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2016/09/13/493739074/50-years-ago-sugar-industry-quietly-paid-scientists-to-point-blame-at-fat

10 – https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/article/the-autopsy-that-changed-football/

11 – https://www.gregpalast.com/the-assassination-of-hugo-chavez/

12 – https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/explain-the-chinese-spy-sen-feinstein/2018/08/09/0560ca60-9bfd-11e8-b60b-1c897f17e185_story
https://web.archive.org/web/20180810010435/https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/explain-the-chinese-spy-sen-feinstein/2018/08/09/0560ca60-9bfd-11e8-b60b-1c897f17e185_story.html?utm_term=.a94d14936345

Categories
Catch All

Fake News, Facts, Fear, Extreme Views & Nuance walked into a bar. Does a person with Tourette’s have Free Won’t?

This headline’s premise of a joke goes nowhere. Similar to asterisks that lead to nowhere, have you noticed that?

There a few stand out experiences that have shaped the way I think over the years. One of them helped me to see people a lot more generously in general. My mother and I were watching the movie The Killing Fields in the theater. In one scene the protagonist, starving, cuts a cow to get some of the cow’s blood before he keeps moving to escape from the Khmer Rouge. My mother said, “Most people want to be left alone to grow their potatoes.”

With this in mind, I wrote the following even though I can’t figure out how that led to this:

It’s difficult to determine what is what when headlines are written to drive people to click and/or share due to corporate advertising supported journalism. And if you are the type who reads entire articles, it’s rare to read reports by the mainstream media on subjects where the information is not framed for the preconceived biases of their audience.

If the reporting is not nuanced, that’s generally a good indicator. Seriously, do you really think that totally building a wall and keeping everyone out OR letting everyone in are realistic approaches? Both are nuts and they are positions pushed through the lens of extremes. Nuance and common sense are not drivers of $$ to oil the corporate advertiser supported media machinery, or to persuade you to vote in one direction or another while not under the feeling of siege that something is going to be taken away from you.

It’s not always the virtuous immigrant or the vile immigrant. People display a wide variety of behavior and each person should not be grouped together as a lump as all this way or all that way. That’s not realistic and it’s also not true.

And while we’re on the subject of facts, sort of, check this article by the BBC in 2017 Most scientists ‘can’t replicate studies by their peers’

Scientists attempting to repeat findings reported in five landmark cancer studies confirmed only two.

According to a survey published in the journal Nature last summer, more than 70% of researchers have tried and failed to reproduce another scientist’s experiments.

https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-39054778
https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-39054778

No transition, like my wandering and wondering thoughts. I tend to favor what a whistle blower is communicating, if they had good credentials before they went rogue, and if something they say aligns with other information from another source. I am able to neither disbelieve or believe anything wholesale. I don’t necessarily accept what they say entirely or go through their brain to see if there is any wrong thought going on elsewhere. The person who brought the “silicon to silicon valley” — William Shockley — “[a] co-inventor of the transistor and the founder of the valley’s first chip company” believed in eugenics. These days, we’d all be taken to task if we didn’t immediately chuck our tech in the trash as we’d likely be labeled “eugenicists” or “eugenicist adjacent”. Essentially, within the same mind there is a diversity of thoughts which have varying degrees of being agreeable or disagreeable to others as well as the thinker of those thoughts. Does a person with Tourette’s have Free Won’t?

It took one person, Peter Buxtun in 1972 with the help of the then media, to blow the whistle on the Tuskegee syphilis experiment which started in 1932. This was an unconscionable, inhumane, and disgusting experiment on 399 black men who were left with untreated syphilis and instead given placebos, even though penicillin became the treatment for syphilis in 1947.

It took one person, Mark Felt, to initiate the take down the Nixon white house. This was also with the help of the Washington Post among other news organizations.

We have not had a Church/Pike Committee since 1975. The Church Committee was a bipartisan committee “which probed not just CIA assassination plots but covert operations, domestic-mail-intercept programs, the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s hounding of Martin Luther King, Jr., and other abuses.”

These days, the rare minority of one type of person is labeled, smeared, and discredited. This is not limited to people: look at the smear job on an old, out-of-patent and never been removed by the FDA, drug has become (HCQ/CQ) through the lens of politics, patents, and fear. I even saw a bit of that toward Zinc, the 24th most abundant mineral on earth and a long established essential trace mineral with 50 years of research to back that up. (Zinc is the 24th most abundant mineral. Corrected on 14 May, 2020.)

All the references are at the bottom of this post. Look how long it took to report on the exceptionally horrible sexual abuse of children by a well known English media personality who was generally respected for his charitable work. Look how the media has not dug deeper into Epstein. There are many plausible reasons to NOT discount the notion that some of the people seen as the “good guys” by the media or in the media, and therefore perceived in that favorable light by their audience, are not actually who they appear to be. By the same token, certainty of a belief in either direction prevents a person from being open to new evidence, also coming from either direction*. (That asterisk does lead to somewhere, scroll down.)

The inertia of certainty about a doctrine, political party, a personality, news media sources, etc., is not ideal.

Shockley
https://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9B07EEDC153BF930A25752C0A96E9C8B63&

Patents
http://www.socialisteconomist.com/2019/08/why-arent-democrats-talking-about.html

Savile
https://www.theguardian.com/media/2014/jun/26/jimmy-savile-sexual-abuse-timeline

Church Committee

“September 11 was Church’s fault, these critics [hawkish conservatives] explain, because his bipartisan committee–which probed not just CIA assassination plots but covert operations, domestic-mail-intercept programs, the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s hounding of Martin Luther King, Jr., and other abuses–broke the spirit of the nation’s intelligence community by exposing its embarrassing missteps.”

https://web.archive.org/web/20061205025524/http://prospect.org/print/V12/19/mooney-c.html

Bill Gates

https://www.thenation.com/article/society/bill-gates-foundation-philanthropy/

https://www.motherjones.com/environment/2013/12/gates-foundations-24-most-egregious-investments/

https://www.motherjones.com/environment/2014/01/kfc-africa-chicken-usaid-gates-foundation/

*New evidence as to the the sincerity of a person can’t be from being purchased if it’s to be genuine.

“$250 million the [Gates] foundation has given to media companies and other groups to influence the news.”

https://www.thenation.com/article/society/bill-gates-foundation-philanthropy/

Categories
Catch All

Feb 25, 2019-Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists: Human error in high-biocontainment labs: a likely pandemic threat. 67% & 79.3% of incidents leading to potential exposures.

On 25 February, 2019 the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists released an article Human error in high-biocontainment labs: a likely pandemic threat. In this article they write:

Human error is the main cause of potential exposures of lab workers to pathogens. Statistical data from two sources show that human error was the cause of, according to my research, 67 percent and 79.3 percent of incidents leading to potential exposures in BSL3 labs. These percentages come from analysis of years of incident data from the Federal Select Agent Program (FSAP) and from the National Institutes of Health (NIH).  (Details may be found in the Supplementary Material document.) 

During the 2009-2015 time period, FSAP received a total of 749 incident reports from select-agent research facilities. Conservatively, 594 or 79.3 percent of those incidents involve human error.

In its 2016 study for the NIH, “Risk and Benefit Analysis of Gain of Function Research,” Gryphon Scientific looked to the transportation, chemical, and nuclear sectors to define types of human error and their probabilities. As Gryphon summarized in its findings, the three types of human error are skill-based (errors involving motor skills involving little thought), rule-based (errors in following instructions or set procedures accidentally or purposely), and knowledge-based (errors stemming from a lack of knowledge or a wrong judgment call based on lack of experience).

https://thebulletin.org/2019/02/human-error-in-high-biocontainment-labs-a-likely-pandemic-threat/

In 2002 SARS-CoV-1 was first located in Foshan, Guangdong, China, on November 16, 2002. The Jiangmen Single Cell Protein Biotechnology Base is located about 100 kilometers from Guangzhou in Guangdong Province.

That was also conveniently located. Live markets are found in many developing countries (no refrigeration required). It’s implausible that both SARS-CoV-1 and SARS-CoV-2 (Covid-19) started near conveniently located labs. The more likely explanation is human error.

This is research from NIH site, PLOS, and Nature. It indicates gain-of-function (gain of a desired function) research.

This was slapped together quickly, so the formatting is not great.

National Institutes of Health
1-JUN-2014 – 31-MAY-2019
Understanding the risk of BAT coronavirus emergence part 1
https://projectreporter.nih.gov/project_info_description.cfm?aid=8674931&icde=49750546

National Institutes of Health
1-JUN-2014 – 31-MAY-2019
Understanding the risk of BAT coronavirus emergence part 2
https://projectreporter.nih.gov/project_info_description.cfm?aid=9819304&icde=49645421

Understanding the Risk of BAT Coronavirus Emergence (Grant site for above 2 references)
Ecohealth Alliance, Inc., New York, NY, United States
Project Start 2014-06-01 Project End 2019-05-31
https://grantome.com/grant/NIH/R01-AI110964-01

Published online 2007 Dec 12. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01085-07
Difference in Receptor Usage between Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) Coronavirus and SARS-Like Coronavirus of BAT Origin
Wuze Ren,1,† Xiuxia Qu,2,† Wendong Li,1,‡ Zhenggang Han,1 Meng Yu,3 Peng Zhou,1 Shu-Yi Zhang,4 Lin-Fa Wang,3,* Hongkui Deng,2 and Zhengli Shi1,*

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2258702/

Pipistrellus BAT coronavirus HKU5 isolate BY140535, complete genome

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/MH002340.1
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/MH002340.1?report=graph

Virology. 2006 Jul 5; 350(2): 358–369.
Published online 2006 Mar 7. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2006.02.003
Furin cleavage of the SARS coronavirus spike glycoprotein enhances cell–cell fusion but does not affect virion entry
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7111780/

New Coronavirus Emerges From BATS in China, Devastates Young Swine Identified in Same Region, from Same BATS, as SARS Coronavirus / April 4, 2018
https://www.niaid.nih.gov/news-events/new-coronavirus-emerges-bats-china-devastates-young-swine

Discovery of a rich gene pool of BAT SARS-related coronaviruses provides new insights into the origin of SARS coronavirus

Published: November 30, 2017
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1006698
https://journals.plos.org/plospathogens/article?id=10.1371/journal.ppat.1006698

Published: 04 April 2018
Fatal swine acute diarrhoea syndrome caused by an HKU2-related coronavirus of BAT origin
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-018-0010-9

Additional Information:

Coronavirus: curse of the ‘Bat Woman’ — what went on in Wuhan lab?
As America puts the screws on Beijing, there is closer scrutiny of claims that the coronavirus leaked from a research centre

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/world/curse-of-the-bat-woman-what-went-on-in-wuhan-lab-pxmws0pzt

Documentary about COVID-19 early coverups and horrors.
https://www.abc.net.au/4corners/coronavirus/11996398

The Moral Hazard of Dealing With China
https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2020/01/stephen-schwarzman-china-surveillance-scholars-colleges/604675/

Waking up to China’s infiltration of American colleges
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/global-opinions/waking-up-to-chinas-infiltration-of-american-colleges/2018/02/18/99d3bee8-13f7-11e8-9570-29c9830535e5_story.html

Chairman Mao and Coronavirus
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/02/07/opinion/coronavirus-china-li-wenliang.html

How China Infiltrated U.S. Classrooms
https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2018/01/16/how-china-infiltrated-us-classrooms-216327

China’s draconian response to the new coronavirus, explained by a China expert
https://www.vox.com/2020/2/4/21122072/china-coronavirus-healthcare

Categories
Catch All

The Tuskegee Atrocity, 1932 – 1972: Has the type of scientist who would design such a vile experiment been removed from the human gene pool? Just one person blew the whistle.

With all the acceptance of evolution and genes, what I find deeply frustrating, is that any person would just think that the type of brains like the scientists involved the 40 year long Tuskegee Syphilis Abhorrent Experiment have been removed or down regulated from the human gene pool. That’s naive.

I was being a bit hyperbolic merely pointing to genes, so also consider other factors such as memes (original definition), also read this by Richard Dawkins, social standing, career protection, ostracization, obedience to authority, parenting, religious faith, and more.

The Tuskegee 40 year long heinous and vile experiment from 1932-1972

The Tuskegee 40 year long heinous and vile experiment of Untreated Syphilis in Human Beings: 399 syphilitic African American male sharecroppers in Macon County, Alabama.

Has the type of scientist who would participate in or design such a vile experiment been removed from the human gene pool? Just one person blew the whistle. One person. Yep, I’m being repetitive intentionally. Did we sterilize the scientists? I’m not kidding. No, that would be unethical to sterilize the scientists who participated and/or designed this horror show. It would be unethical. Nevertheless even the mere consideration that that all scientists or individuals with high IQs are running an empathy program in their brains is just preposterous.

Penicillin was discovered in 1928 and in use by 1942 to treat syphilis, but not in the Tuskegee Atrocious Experiment

Also “Never Again” is not working if we don’t actually learn from history. See Rwandan Genocide, 1994.

The United States Public Health Service (USPHS) Syphilis Study at Tuskegee (1932–72), a study of 399 syphilitic African American male sharecroppers in Macon County, Alabama, who were followed for 40 years so that researchers could observe the effects of untreated syphilis on various organ systems, is arguably the most infamous biomedical research study in U.S. history.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1780164/

Just look at the titles and wording of the timeline and history articles used by the NIH and CDC today. Plenty of years to use some adjectives at least. Calling the Tuskegee Abomination Experiment a Study is a tell. They. still. call. it. a. study.

Racism and Research: The Case of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/721302/

The Tuskegee Timeline

https://www.cdc.gov/tuskegee/timeline.htm

Once again: It was ONE PERSON, Peter Buxtun, in 1972 who blew the whistle. It was the media who shined the light on this evil, 40 year long atrocity of an experiment on human beings.

Our current media is not the same as the past. Money. Paid off to the recent tune of 250 million (and more over the years) by The Gates Foundation (and no doubt others) for image control. See The Nation and Mother Jones images and links below.

This charitable donation is a small part of the $250 million the [Gates] foundation has given to media companies and other groups to influence the news.

March 2020: https://www.thenation.com/article/society/bill-gates-foundation-philanthropy/
https://www.thenation.com/article/society/bill-gates-foundation-philanthropy/
https://www.motherjones.com/environment/2013/12/gates-foundations-24-most-egregious-investments

No amount of money—a measly $10 million even in 1973 dollars—will remove the type of scientist that will do this for decades from the gene pool. Decades. And it took a ONE PERSON (the minority of one) Peter Buxtun to raise the alarm.

And get this: the US Government also “agreed to provide free medical treatment to surviving participants and to surviving family members infected as a consequence of the study” (wiki). Isn’t that special? So special.

The Tuskegee Legacy Project: Willingness of Minorities to Participate in Biomedical Research.

Outrageous: The United States Public Health Service (USPHS) Syphilis Study at Tuskegee (1932–72), a study of 399 syphilitic African American male sharecroppers in Macon County, Alabama, who were followed for 40 years so that researchers could observe the effects of untreated syphilis on various organ systems, is arguably the most infamous biomedical research study in U.S. history.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1780164/

Have we improved? Is self-interest and thinking that other human beings are less valuable gone away?

https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2011/jul/04/ethics-left-behing-drug-trials-developing

An example of how morality is not necessarily a program running in some scientists’s brains. Only 40% of scientists believe in God. Belief or disbelief is not measure of ethics or morality, but it is something to consider. I know many non-believers who are deeply moral, so I hesitated to write this, but I did it anyway.

50 Years Ago, Sugar Industry Quietly Paid [Harvard] Scientists To Point Blame At Fat.
https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2016/09/13/493739074/50-years-ago-sugar-industry-quietly-paid-scientists-to-point-blame-at-f

Tuskegee’s Long Arm Still Touches a Nerve
(What a tame title, it could be more explicit.)

https://www.nytimes.com/1997/04/13/weekinreview/tuskegee-s-long-arm-still-touches-a-nerve.html
Categories
Catch All

The diversity of thoughts and doing the right thing

This story, recalled only from memory, is one that a disciple of Meher Baba’s would tell. The intent of this, for me, is to illustrate our diversity of thoughts and how these thoughts are all equally valid subjectively but not objectively. His point of view, I assume, is that a person should not follow the world but instead follow God or Inner Truth (mystic not ideology based Truth).

Donkey, Grandpa, and Grandson

Grandpa and his grandson wanted to visit their relatives in a village a few villages away.

Grandpa got on the family donkey’s back and the grandson walked. Within moments of entering the village center, some people said, “Just look at that old man! He thinks nothing of the young child and his bare feet on this hot day.”

The grandpa and his grandson thought about this. Grandpa got off the donkey and exchanged places with his grandson.

As they entered the next village center, some people said, “Just look at that young boy! He’s being selfish and not caring for the old man. He’s not thinking about hard it must be to walk in this hot sun at his advanced age.”

The grandpa and his grandson thought about this. The child got on the donkey and sat behind grandpa and they travelled out of the village and into the next.

Upon entering this village center, some people said, “Just see how selfish those two are are! How they treat that beast of burden by both sitting on the donkey’s back!” (And they haven’t given him any water since the writer—me—sucks.)

Grandpa and his grandson thought about this burden on the donkey and both got off the donkey and walked toward their relative’s home. Upon reaching a gathering of people just outside of the village center, some people said, “Just see what fools they are! They have a donkey yet they are walking beside him. Fools!”

End.

In addition, I hope this illustrates the genuine diversity that everyone has, irrespective of immutable characteristics. Everyone thinks differently. Everyone. You don’t know the thoughts of the other person and you don’t know the next thought that arises in your own consciousness. Thoughts just show up. We don’t pre-think our thoughts. But you can adjust the inclination, as follows:

Whatever a monk keeps pursuing with his thinking and pondering, that becomes the inclination of his awareness. If a monk keeps pursuing thinking imbued with sensuality, abandoning thinking imbued with renunciation, his mind is bent by that thinking imbued with sensuality. If a monk keeps pursuing thinking imbued with ill will, abandoning thinking imbued with non-ill will, his mind is bent by that thinking imbued with ill will. If a monk keeps pursuing thinking imbued with harmfulness, abandoning thinking imbued with harmlessness, his mind is bent by that thinking imbued with harmfulness.

Buddha, Dvedhavitakka sutta

And this is why I barely think about Trump or anyone I find unfavorable to my inclination. I trained my mind via counter-thinking over many years. When I see such tribal signaling and moral signaling articles in The New Yorker about how Trump is not mourning the loss of 50,000 people who have died from Covid-19, I think what a waste of bytes. As if he’s going to all of a sudden start pretending to care. Also who says he doesn’t care in his own way? I don’t know what goes on between his ears anymore than anyone else does. I also think that anyone who gets outraged by Trump is falling for his game. You are now thinking about him more than if you loved him. No shit. And your version of Trump becomes your inclination.

What you think, you become-ish.

Categories
Catch All

Updated with peer reviewed data and other research: Zinc (Zn) + Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) Zn : Essential Trace Mineral + HCQ : Zinc Ionophore

4 June 2020 update:

On 2 June Science (not chump change) published an article questioning (what a concept) the 22 May 2020 Lancet Study that was touted as the end all be all about Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) / Chloroquine (CQ) and Covid-19.

 “[The study published in Lancet] began to stretch and stretch and stretch credulity,” says Nicholas White, a malaria researcher at Mahidol University in Bangkok.

https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/06/mysterious-company-s-coronavirus-papers-top-medical-journals-may-be-unraveling

This study that stretches credulity was widely written about in the MSM. Here’s me on Twitter on 23 May.

Look for ______ in the same press.

Here’s me on Twitter on 23 May

A mysterious company’s coronavirus papers in top medical journals may be unraveling

https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/06/mysterious-company-s-coronavirus-papers-top-medical-journals-may-be-unraveling

What a massive database of retracted papers reveals about science publishing’s ‘death penalty’

https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2018/10/what-massive-database-retracted-papers-reveals-about-science-publishing-s-death-penalty


This was updated on Saturday, 9 May 2020. But first a disclaimer: Zinc is not to be taken like it’s candy. Nearly all pills are 50 mg—a lot more than the RDA. In fact it’s probably better to use a lozenge.

Both the authors of your article and the Cochrane reviewers generalized too far, apparently forgetting that all the common cold treatment studies used zinc lozenges that dissolved slowly in the mouth, rather than (swallowed) zinc tablets or syrups. This is an extremely important difference, because oral dissolution of throat lozenges over a 20- to 30-minute period allows ionic zinc (which has multiple properties of value in treating colds2) to be locally absorbed and transported into the virally infected nose.3 Swallowed tablets offer no such benefit to the nasal tissues.

https://www.mdedge.com/familymedicine/article/64610/zinc-colds-yes-dont-swallow-whole


Zinc is an essential trace mineral, but it’s a TRACE mineral. Read as much as you can about what you consume. Do you read the ingredients of the food you eat? I hope so. Do you look stuff up from numerous sources regarding supplements? I hope so.

On 6 May, a peer-reviewed article was published in Medical Hypotheses.

Does zinc supplementation enhance the clinical efficacy of chloroquine/hydroxychloroquine to win todays battle against COVID-19?

Read the entire article, I’m just posting snippets. Essentially affirmative “Based on the evidence of therapeutic effects of CQ/HCQ, their possible pharmacological effect as zinc ionophores”. Read the article and also click on the footnotes.

Regarding Zinc alone:

Supplementation of zinc is known to be clinically relatively safe if dosing ranges and upper limits of dosing are based on recommended dietary allowances [20]. In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial oral zinc supplementation with 45 mg zinc per day for 12 months demonstrated a significant lower incidence of infections in the elderly and was very well tolerated [21].

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2020.109815

Based on the evidence of therapeutic effects of CQ/HCQ, their possible pharmacological effect as zinc ionophores and possibly underestimated specific and unspecific antiviral effects of zinc, we hypothesize that the combination of CQ/HCQ with zinc in the treatment of COVID-19 patients, in an out- or inpatients setting, may help to improve clinical outcomes and to limit the COVID-19 fatality rates [1][2].

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2020.109815

Posted on May 8, 2020 on a Preprint server (not peer reviewed yet), is this report which includes those using Zinc and not using Zinc. Imagine if they were treated earlier. Source page 21 of 22/

Page 21 of 22:
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.05.02.20080036v1.full.pdf

Previous content:

For information purposes only. There are many studies that suggest that HCQ is worse than the disease. I think that these studies are intentionally designed to fail as follows:

  1. People are given insanely high dose of HCQ (well beyond the recommended dose)
  2. Don’t include Zinc;
  3. Usually include Zithromax (Z-Pak)/ Azithromycin (why?)
  4. HCQ has been around since 1955 and millions of people use it at the recommended dose.
  5. HCQ and Zinc are not patentable. One is out of patent and one is from nature. Patentability is where the big bucks are.

First, it is necessary to realize that having drugs available at free market prices, without patent monopolies or other forms of exclusivity, would have an enormous impact on the economy and the health care system. On the first point, we will spend more than $460 billion on prescription drugs in 2019. Without patent protection, these drugs would almost certainly sell for less than $80 billion, implying a savings of more than $380 billion.

http://www.socialisteconomist.com/2019/08/why-arent-democrats-talking-about.html

Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and Chloroquine (CQ) have been out of patent for a long time. This means they are generic and rather inexpensive. A lot of the world supply is manufactured in India because of the higher malaria risk there. Trump has a very small stake via a mutual fund called Dodge&Cox that includes a French pharmaceutical company, just one of the many manufacturers. CQ and HCQ have been prescribed for around 70 years and ingested by masses of people (India alone can qualify as masses). Is any drug safe for everyone? I doubt it. Also consider that there’s a long list of FDA withdrawn drugs—go to section § 216.24. Ranitidine [Zantac] has not been added to this list yet—that were previously clinically trialed and approved.

Trump recently said something like “they say it must be used with zinc.” I didn’t hear him, but I did see the backlash on Twitter. HCQ and CQ are Zinc Ionophores (ionophores transport ions across a cell membrane). There are natural sources of Zinc Ionophores, such as Quercetin or Molybdenum. Zinc, Quercetin, and Molybdenum are all found in food. Here, here, and here.

An abundance of evidence has accumulated over the past 50 y[ears] to demonstrate the antiviral activity of zinc against a variety of viruses, and via numerous mechanisms. 

The Role of Zinc in Antiviral Immunity / Advances in Nutrition, Volume 10, Issue 4, July 2019

Also from the same source as the quote above: Zinc status is a critical factor that can influence antiviral immunity, particularly as zinc-deficient populations are often most at risk of acquiring viral infections”. We learn from Zinc Transporters, Mechanisms of Action and Therapeutic Utility: Implications for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus that some people have dysfunctional zinc signaling, which is “associated with a number of chronic disease states including cancer, cardiovascular disease, Alzheimer’s disease, and diabetes.” Many, many people cannot afford decent, nutrient dense food.

Zinc deficiency is strikingly common, affecting up to a quarter of the population in developing countries, but also affecting distinct populations in the developed world as a result of lifestyle, age, and disease-mediated factors

The Role of Zinc in Antiviral Immunity / Advances in Nutrition, Volume 10, Issue 4, July 2019,

Zinc [Zn] and pyrithione [PT] (another zinc ionophore) inhibit nidovirus [nidovirales is an order of viruses that includes the families Coronaviridae, Arteriviridae and others] replication in vivo
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2973827/

We found that addition of ZnOAc2 alone also reduced virus [SARS-CoV-GFP and EAV-GFP] replication, but only at levels that were close to the 50% cytotoxicity concentration (CC50) of ZnOAc2 in Vero-E6 cells (∼70 µM, data not shown). This is likely due to the poor solubility of Zn2+ in phosphate-containing medium and the inefficient uptake of Zn2+ by cells in the absence of zinc-ionophores. 

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2973827/

Hopefully you see the objective fact that the importance of zinc with zinc ionophores has been around for a while. Any clinical trial or treatment that does not include zinc will rely on each individual’s zinc status (and other health factors of course). This includes whether an individual is zinc deficient from his or her diet or has dysfunctional zinc signaling. So not only is it a crap shoot when a person with COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) is just getting HCQ without zinc, it’s deeply heartbreaking.

Notes and Links:

When you’re healthy and not at risk, I think it’s definitely better to consume nutrients via food rather than in pill form. In this way, perhaps in a one pot wonder, you are most likely getting two or three target nutrients at once, plus many trace minerals and cofactors.

The information about CQ with Zinc by Roger Seheult, MD was posted by a Facebook friend on 12 March (two days after Dr. Seheult posted it); at least a week before Trump started talking about HCQ (but not with Zinc).

Zinc Gluconate and the Common Cold: A Controlled Clinical Study

A report in 1984 on the success of zinc gluconate against common cold symptoms could not be confirmed in three subsequent studies, which are now known to have used formulations that inactivated zinc. A non-chelating formulation including glycine, which releases 93% of contained zinc into saliva, was tested in a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial in 73 young adults. Efficacy was recorded in symptom diaries using a symptom severity rating. Patients’ symptoms first appeared 1.34 days prior to entry to the study in both groups. Disappearance of symptoms occurred after an additional 4.9 days for zinc-treated patients versus 6.1 days for placebo-treated patients. A difference was noted in the efficacy of treatment if it was started 1 day after symptom onset: cold duration was an additional 4.3 days in zinc-treated patients compared with 9.2 days for placebo-treated patients. Cough, nasal drainage and congestion were the symptoms most affected, and only mild side-effects were noted.


https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1397668

Efficacy of Zinc Against Common Cold Viruses: An Overview

Human rhinoviruses, by attaching to the nasal epithelium via the intracellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) receptor, cause most colds. Ionic zinc, based on its electrical charge, also has an affinity for ICAM-1 receptor sites and may exert an antiviral effect by attaching to the ICAM-1 receptors in the rhinovirus structure and nasal epithelial cells. Clinical tests of zinc for treatment of common colds have been inconsistent, primarily because of study design, blinding, and lozenge contents. Early formulations of lozenges also were unpalatable. In three trials with similar study designs, methodologies, and efficacy assessments, zinc effectively and significantly shortened the duration of the common cold when it was administered within 24 hours of the onset of symptoms. Recent reports of trials with zinc gluconate administered as a nasal gel have supported these findings; in addition, they have shown that treatment with zinc nasal gel is effective in reducing the duration and severity of common cold symptoms in patients with established illness.

https://www.japha.org/article/S1544-3191(15)31790-8/fulltext
Categories
Catch All

Trump is not omnipotent. A response to the Atlantic opinion piece “With Each Briefing, Trump Is Making Us Worse People.”

This is in response to the Atlantic opinion pieceWith Each Briefing, Trump Is Making Us Worse People.The choice of headline (yes, I read the piece) and the rest of the opinion, the author attributes omnipotence on Trump that Trump does not possess: the ability to make us worse people. The ability to not let other people live one’s head rent free is up to each individual. Effort is required.

“A physician is not angry at the intemperance of a mad patient, nor does he take it ill to be railed at by a man in fever. Just so should a wise man treat all mankind, as a physician does his patient, and look upon them only as sick and extravagant.” — Seneca

It has been often observed, and I’ve observed it as well, that some Trump supporters behave like cultists. On the other hand, I’ve also observed many individuals on the political left (and some on the never Trumper right) let this person into their head even more.

These individuals have thought about Trump so often and criticized him so much, that their previous personalities have been modified. Centrists, and others, have called this the Trump Derangement Syndrome. The author of this piece appears to be suffering from it.

The “briefings” are (looking at the WH YT channel) around 1 hr 43 min long or longer. I highly doubt even the most ardent Trump supporter watches these entirely. Instead clips will be disseminated to the masses and edited for effect based on the reading bias of the particular news organization’s audience or individual journalist’s Twitter followers.

Trump was notorious about gaming the system. He didn’t pay his bills. This was known long ago. I saw the guy the first time in the late 80s and didn’t find him appealing. He is still in that category with some exceptions. However, I don’t hate him. I don’t think about him much at all. I also dislike Nancy Pelosi about the same degree and she barely enters my mind. Read some neuroscience and you’ll discover that Seneca was on to something.

Categories
Catch All

I was friends with a guy named Vernon in 2005. He was the top guy on the Tyson kill floor. He saw grown men fall to their knees and pray out loud to God for forgiveness.

Anyone interested in human rights ought to know that abattoirs have very high human rights violations and injury rates. Line speed is the top factor for where the most injuries occur to the workers. I was friends with a guy named Vernon in 2005. He was the top guy on the Tyson kill floor (that’s what they call it). He described the torture to the human spirit. He saw grown men fall to their knees and pray out loud to God for forgiveness.

We humans have the fork power to eat fewer beings and boycott these practices.

A Slaughterhouse Nightmare: Psychological Harm Suffered by Slaughterhouse Employees and the Possibility of Redress through Legal Reform

https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1016401

Blood, Sweat, and Fear

Workers’ Rights in U.S. Meat and Poultry Plants

https://www.hrw.org/report/2005/01/24/blood-sweat-and-fear/workers-rights-us-meat-and-poultry-plants